From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: UPDATE of partition key |
Date: | 2017-06-10 02:11:14 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1LeH7R0priH2-hDrohAeimwGwZNoRmKYQAoPa63U257cw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 7:48 PM, Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On 9 June 2017 at 19:10, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 10:40 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 7:01 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I think before doing above check we can simply check if ctid.ip_blkid
>>>> contains InvalidBlockNumber, then return an error.
>>>
>>> Hmm, OK. That case never happens today?
>>>
>>
>> As per my understanding that case doesn't exist. I will verify again
>> once the patch is available. I can take a crack at it if Amit
>> Khandekar is busy with something else or is not comfortable in this
>> area.
>
> Amit, I was going to have a look at this, once I finish with the other
> part.
>
Sure, will wait for your patch to be available. I can help by
reviewing the same.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Stark | 2017-06-10 02:54:03 | Re: Notes on testing Postgres 10b1 |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2017-06-09 23:17:20 | Re: logical replication NOTICE "synchronized table states" |