Re: ALTER SYSTEM RESET?

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Christoph Berg <cb(at)df7cb(dot)de>, Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)dalibo(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ALTER SYSTEM RESET?
Date: 2014-06-29 03:13:17
Message-ID: CAA4eK1LcLDLRAqShwd4oQp=xPyU7AvqtpcerRgA3ox=6T_iz9A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 10:38 PM, Christoph Berg <cb(at)df7cb(dot)de> wrote:
> Re: Vik Fearing 2014-06-27 <53AD15F7(dot)2060506(at)dalibo(dot)com>
> > Amit,
> >
> > I added this to the next commitfest with your name as reviewer.
> >
> > https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=1495
> >
> > Please update the status as you see fit.
>
> Isn't this 9.4 material?

I think it's late for adding new feature/sub-feature/minor enhancement in
9.4, unless without that base feature won't work.

Isn't your use case addressed by alternative suggested by me upthread?

With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2014-06-29 06:23:28 Re: better atomics - v0.5
Previous Message MauMau 2014-06-28 22:48:22 Re: [Fwd: Re: proposal: new long psql parameter --on-error-stop]