Re: Separate GUC for replication origins

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Separate GUC for replication origins
Date: 2025-03-20 03:15:04
Message-ID: CAA4eK1L_piYk_iOWj6imVqhwi7SQkjMMeNaGh8h7kq5ArAR8=Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 10:43 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 6:05 PM Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 17, 2025, at 8:44 PM, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> >
> > I would suggest putting the new max_active_replication_origins after
> > max_parallel_apply_workers_per_subscription as both
> > max_sync_workers_per_subscription and
> > max_parallel_apply_workers_per_subscription are related to
> > max_logical_replication_workers.
> >
> >
> > Good point. Looking at the documentation, the old max_replication_slots
> > parameter was the first one in that section so I decided to use the same order
> > for the postgresql.conf.sample.
>
> Thank you for updating the patch!
>

*
<para>
Logical replication requires several configuration options to be set. Most
- options are relevant only on one side of the replication. However,
- <varname>max_replication_slots</varname> is used on both the publisher and
- the subscriber, but it has a different meaning for each.
+ options are relevant only on one side of the replication.
</para>

In this para, after removing the content about max_replication_slots,
the other line: "Most options are relevant only on one side of the
replication." doesn't make sense because there is no other option that
applies to both sides and if there is one then we should mention about
that.

> The patch looks good to me.
>

Other than the above, the patch looks good to me as well.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Paul Jungwirth 2025-03-20 03:32:38 Re: SQL:2011 application time
Previous Message David G. Johnston 2025-03-20 02:15:43 Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files