Re: PG 10 release notes

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PG 10 release notes
Date: 2017-04-28 02:49:05
Message-ID: CAA4eK1LKjTC-axTAxE2eN2xTtZZ2DUm5-+RaPjzkT0-p-K8p8g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 7:53 PM, Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 4:13 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 08:00:28AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
>> > > Oh, so non-correlated subqueries can be run in parallel. Yes, that is
>> > > something we should have in the release notes. How is this?
>> > >
>> > > Author: Robert Haas <rhaas(at)postgresql(dot)org>
>> > > 2017-02-14 [5e6d8d2bb] Allow parallel workers to execute
>> > > subplans.
>> > >
>> > > Allow non-correlated subqueries to be run in parallel (Amit
>> > > Kapila)
>> > >
>> >
>> > Looks good to me.
>
>
> It's not clear from this item what the previous behavior was. How about
> adding something like "Correlated subqueries can not yet be parallelized."?
> (I'm guessing that's the change, anyway, please correct me if I'm mistaken.)
>

Previous to this change queries containing a reference to subplans
(correlated or un-correlated) doesn't get parallelised.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2017-04-28 04:08:44 proposal psql \gdesc
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2017-04-28 01:43:04 Re: [PostgreSQL 10] default of hot_standby should be "on"?