| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>, "wangw(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <wangw(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply |
| Date: | 2023-02-07 07:37:14 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1LGPP7__u085PkythqoW-zet8umcAfsoytFE26v7Hr8aw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 12:41 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 6:44 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > We need to think of a predictable
> > way to test this path which may not be difficult. But I guess it would
> > be better to wait for some feedback from the field about this feature
> > before adding more to it and anyway it shouldn't be a big deal to add
> > this later as well.
>
> Agreed to hear some feedback before adding it. It's not an urgent feature.
>
Okay, Thanks! AFAIK, there is no pending patch left in this proposal.
If so, I think it is better to close the corresponding CF entry.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com | 2023-02-07 07:46:05 | RE: Deadlock between logrep apply worker and tablesync worker |
| Previous Message | wangw.fnst@fujitsu.com | 2023-02-07 07:28:33 | RE: [PATCH] Reuse Workers and Replication Slots during Logical Replication |