Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions
Date: 2020-09-07 06:30:41
Message-ID: CAA4eK1LEEhtTEnDnrWcZryOGBdhi_6X4h2MJaFgbCo5+EhRBCQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Sep 5, 2020 at 8:55 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> I have reviewed the changes and looks fine to me.
>

Thanks, I have pushed the last patch. Let's wait for a day or so to
see the buildfarm reports and then we can probably close this CF
entry. I am aware that we have one patch related to stats still
pending but I think we can tackle it along with the spill stats patch
which is being discussed in a different thread [1]. Do let me know if
I have missed anything?

[1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAA4eK1JBqQh9cBKjO-nKOOE%3D7f6ONDCZp0TJZfn4VsQqRZ%2BuYA%40mail.gmail.com

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2020-09-07 06:58:58 Re: Online checksums verification in the backend
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2020-09-07 06:29:02 Re: A micro-optimisation for walkdir()