Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions
Date: 2020-09-09 03:11:57
Message-ID: CAA4eK1LCFVPGP21AjEBzLhSpgVHzO7ZTmpAE+a46eCLAGRgesg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 12:57 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 12:00 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Sep 5, 2020 at 8:55 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > I have reviewed the changes and looks fine to me.
>> >
>>
>> Thanks, I have pushed the last patch. Let's wait for a day or so to
>> see the buildfarm reports and then we can probably close this CF
>> entry.
>
>
> Thanks.
>

I have updated the status of CF entry as committed now.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2020-09-09 03:49:55 Re: Two fsync related performance issues?
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2020-09-09 03:04:03 Re: Inconsistency in determining the timestamp of the db statfile.