Re: doc fix for pg_stat_activity.backend_type

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: jcnaylor(at)gmail(dot)com
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: doc fix for pg_stat_activity.backend_type
Date: 2018-11-15 05:49:27
Message-ID: CAA4eK1LC5et5xy547RkwWnLyoQXg2s9mSX5NUN_QY0zOwk90Rg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 5:03 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 3:37 PM John Naylor <jcnaylor(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > > + In addition, extensions may have additional types.
> > >
> > > How about: "In addition, background workers registered by extensions
> > > may have additional types."?
> >
> > Sounds good to me -- I've included this language.
> >
>
> LGTM. I will wait for a day or so, if nobody has any comments, I will
> push your patch.
>

Pushed, thanks for working on this.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2018-11-15 05:53:47 Re: ATTACH/DETACH PARTITION CONCURRENTLY
Previous Message Laurenz Albe 2018-11-15 05:48:00 Re: reloption to prevent VACUUM from truncating empty pages at the end of relation