Re: INSERT INTO SELECT, Why Parallelism is not selected?

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: INSERT INTO SELECT, Why Parallelism is not selected?
Date: 2020-07-24 11:59:11
Message-ID: CAA4eK1LBbGkyDPOYN+udbdU2fXvH-v_skMf8yfJX7Cg6FJFvyQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 11:24 AM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Do you have something else in mind?
>

I am planning to commit the comments change patch attached in the
above email [1] next week sometime (probably Monday or Tuesday) unless
you have something more to add?

[1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAA4eK1%2BRL7c_s%3D%2BTwAE6DJ1MmupbEiGCFLt97US%2BDMm6UxAjTA%40mail.gmail.com

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amul Sul 2020-07-24 13:09:14 Re: [Patch] ALTER SYSTEM READ ONLY
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2020-07-24 11:35:02 Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions