| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com> |
| Cc: | David Pirotte <dpirotte(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Any objections to implementing LogicalDecodeMessageCB for pgoutput? |
| Date: | 2021-04-05 07:06:07 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1LBStkysmAG5muwNKxsvWZQ=k4_g+ZEVFzi0cY-1NdRug@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Apr 3, 2021 at 5:26 AM Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 1, 2021, at 7:19 AM, Amit Kapila wrote:
>
> This new patch set version has 2 patches that is because there are 2 separate
> changes: parse_output_parameters() refactor and logical decoding message
> support.
>
I have made few minor changes in the attached. (a) Initialize the
streaming message callback API, (b) update docs to reflect that XID
can be sent for streaming of in-progress transactions, I see that the
same information needs to be updated for a few other protocol message
but we can do that as a separate patch (c) slightly tweaked the commit
messages
Let me know what you think? I am planning to push this tomorrow unless
you or someone else has any comments.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v4-0001-Refactor-function-parse_output_parameters.patch | application/octet-stream | 4.5 KB |
| v4-0002-Allow-pgoutput-to-send-logical-decoding-messages.patch | application/octet-stream | 14.4 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2021-04-05 07:13:27 | Re: Stronger safeguard for archive recovery not to miss data |
| Previous Message | tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com | 2021-04-05 07:04:09 | RE: Stronger safeguard for archive recovery not to miss data |