Re: Any objections to implementing LogicalDecodeMessageCB for pgoutput?

From: "Euler Taveira" <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>
To: "Amit Kapila" <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "David Pirotte" <dpirotte(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Ashutosh Bapat" <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Dave Cramer" <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Michael Paquier" <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, "Andres Freund" <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Ashutosh Bapat" <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Any objections to implementing LogicalDecodeMessageCB for pgoutput?
Date: 2021-04-05 12:15:33
Message-ID: 61e35b37-22cb-4565-be80-9c52c5e2f3a3@www.fastmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Apr 5, 2021, at 4:06 AM, Amit Kapila wrote:
> I have made few minor changes in the attached. (a) Initialize the
> streaming message callback API, (b) update docs to reflect that XID
> can be sent for streaming of in-progress transactions, I see that the
> same information needs to be updated for a few other protocol message
> but we can do that as a separate patch (c) slightly tweaked the commit
> messages
Good catch. I completely forgot the streaming of in progress transactions. I
agree that the documentation for transaction should be added as a separate
patch since the scope is beyond this feature.

--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2021-04-05 12:16:04 Re: Stronger safeguard for archive recovery not to miss data
Previous Message Sait Talha Nisanci 2021-04-05 12:07:29 Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Crash in record_type_typmod_compare