Re: pg_decode_message vs skip_empty_xacts and xact_wrote_changes

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: pg_decode_message vs skip_empty_xacts and xact_wrote_changes
Date: 2023-07-05 08:58:00
Message-ID: CAA4eK1LA=gb0xyg+-93WJOX1EEJE8qroPQnNw==DreuW2VDm7g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jul 3, 2023 at 4:49 PM vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> +1 for the first version patch, I also felt the first version is
> easily understandable.
>

Okay, please find the slightly updated version (changed a comment and
commit message). Unless there are more comments, I'll push this in a
day or two.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2023-07-05 08:58:56 Re: pg_decode_message vs skip_empty_xacts and xact_wrote_changes
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2023-07-05 08:49:35 Re: pg_upgrade and cross-library upgrades