Re: Fix for parallel BTree initialization bug

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Cc: "Jameson, Hunter 'James'" <hunjmes(at)amazon(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <rhaas(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Rahila Syed <rahila(dot)syed(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Fix for parallel BTree initialization bug
Date: 2020-09-14 12:37:09
Message-ID: CAA4eK1L8QYw9HwBhF32b=nCtn-XcHSo-=1qnNJsPwtJMYsCBfA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 4:41 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 8:07 AM Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> I have tested this on HEAD. It would be great if you can verify in
> back branches as well. I'll also do it before commit.
>

I am planning to push this tomorrow after doing testing on
back-branches. Let me know if you have any comments.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2020-09-14 12:39:42 Re: TDE (Transparent Data Encryption) supported ?
Previous Message Domagoj Smoljanovic 2020-09-14 12:27:13 pg_restore causing deadlocks on partitioned tables