From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dilip kumar <dilip(dot)kumar(at)huawei(dot)com> |
Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jan Lentfer <Jan(dot)Lentfer(at)web(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Sawada Masahiko <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br> |
Subject: | Re: TODO : Allow parallel cores to be used by vacuumdb [ WIP ] |
Date: | 2014-11-13 07:34:56 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1L72igLrnY-qUEuKEU8XiZBNFk4zCzYoNCC+iTUj--Qtg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 5:26 PM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
>
>
> Going further with verification of this patch, I found below issue:
> Run the testcase.sql file at below link:
>
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/4205E661176A124FAF891E0A6BA9135266347F25@szxeml509-mbs.china.huawei.com
> ./vacuumdb --analyze-in-stages -j 8 -d postgres
> Generating minimal optimizer statistics (1 target)
> Segmentation fault
>
> Server Log:
> ERROR: syntax error at or near "minimal" at character 12
> STATEMENT: ANALYZE ng minimal optimizer statistics (1 target)
> LOG: could not receive data from client: Connection reset by peer
>
As mentioned by you offlist that you are not able reproduce this
issue, I have tried again and what I observe is that I am able to
reproduce it only on *release* build and some cases work without
this issue as well,
example:
./vacuumdb --analyze-in-stages -t t1 -t t2 -t t3 -t t4 -t t5 -t t6 -t t7 -t
t8 -j 8 -d postgres
Generating minimal optimizer statistics (1 target)
Generating medium optimizer statistics (10 targets)
Generating default (full) optimizer statistics
So to me, it looks like this is a timing issue and please notice
why in error the statement looks like
"ANALYZE ng minimal optimizer statistics (1 target)". I think this
is not a valid statement.
Let me know if you still could not reproduce it.
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2014-11-13 07:45:54 | Re: recovery_target_time and standby_mode |
Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2014-11-13 07:26:01 | Re: group locking: incomplete patch, just for discussion |