Re: why not parallel seq scan for slow functions

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: why not parallel seq scan for slow functions
Date: 2017-09-20 04:15:14
Message-ID: CAA4eK1L6ZpPgw9dyR=gEY1Hn8bkJOtwjtV2ahJykORNUBD1_xg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 3:05 AM, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 1:17 PM, Thomas Munro
> <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 3:19 PM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
>> wrote:
>> > The attached patch fixes both the review comments as discussed above.
>
>
> that should be fixed by turning costs on the explain, as is the tradition.
>

Right. BTW, did you get a chance to run the original test (for which
you have reported the problem) with this patch?

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig Ringer 2017-09-20 04:16:23 Re: src/test/subscription/t/002_types.pl hanging on particular environment
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2017-09-20 04:14:59 Re: Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively) partitioned tables