Re: Allow logical replication to copy tables in binary format

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Melih Mutlu <m(dot)melihmutlu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, "Takamichi Osumi (Fujitsu)" <osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Allow logical replication to copy tables in binary format
Date: 2023-03-14 03:17:03
Message-ID: CAA4eK1L68osj4aX=XPKOpdqPcsRBRumzZyXSv+yrnrur5Dpkdg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 6:18 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 11:06 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > Here are some review comments for patch v12-0001
> >
> > ======
> > General
> >
> > 1.
> > There is no new test code. Are we sure that there are already
> > sufficient TAP tests doing binary testing with/without copy_data and
> > covering all the necessary combinations?
> >
>
> Oops. Please ignore this comment. Somehow I missed seeing those
> 032_binary_copy.pl tests earlier.
>

I think it would better to write the tests for this feature in the
existing test file 014_binary as that would save some time for node
setup/shutdown and also that would be a more appropriate place for
these tests.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bharath Rupireddy 2023-03-14 03:32:23 Re: Improve WALRead() to suck data directly from WAL buffers when possible
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2023-03-14 02:38:45 Re: Sub-millisecond [autovacuum_]vacuum_cost_delay broken