| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
| Cc: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: subscriptionCheck failures |
| Date: | 2021-03-17 03:10:04 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1L2Q_A_bViU34TSvK-68YLpdNcUh8mM0t-kE1P5JOhMvg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 6:22 PM osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com
<osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> To me, this correctly works because
> the timing I put the while loop and stops the walsender
> makes the DROP SUBSCRIPTION affects two slots. Any comments ?
>
No, your testing looks fine. I have also done the similar test. Pushed!
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2021-03-17 03:16:58 | Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2021-03-17 03:08:43 | Re: pg_subscription - substream column? |