From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, hlinnaka <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
Subject: | Re: SerializeParamList vs machines with strict alignment |
Date: | 2018-10-03 02:59:04 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1L2M1-4EyFKV6Ogopc=KDexg+SaTfOmZW2cF8YQYJV-EA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 12:25 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> >> Okay, I have pushed the test case patch on HEAD. Attached is the
> >> code-fix patch, let's wait for a day so that we have all the results
> >> which can help us to discuss the merits of this patch.
>
> > By now, the added test has failed on gharial [1] with below log on the server:
>
> Yeah, gharial and anole both don't like this, which is interesting
> but not really surprising, considering that IA64 is in some part
> an HPPA follow-on architecture.
>
Now chipmunk also failed for the same test.
> What I find more interesting is
> that both of the live Sparc critters are happy --- so despite
> Thomas' statements upthread, they're coping with unaligned accesses.
> Maybe you should have back-patched the test to older branches so
> we could see what castoroides and protosciurus would do. But it's
> probably not worth additional delay.
>
Agreed, I will push the code-fix on HEAD and code+test in back-branches.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2018-10-03 03:37:18 | Re: partition tree inspection functions |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2018-10-03 02:07:06 | Re: file cloning in pg_upgrade and CREATE DATABASE |