Re: Functions 'is_publishable_class' and 'is_publishable_relation' should stay together.

On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 3:29 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
>
> On 2022-Jul-29, Peter Smith wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 7:36 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
> > >
> > > I don't object to doing this, but I think these two functions should
> > > stay together nonetheless.
> >
> > If you believe there is still a problem after applying the patch
> > please explicitly name what function(s) you think should be moved.
>
> Well, I checked the commit and the functions I was talking about look OK
> now. However, looking again, pg_relation_is_publishable is in the wrong
> place (should be right below is_publishable_relaton), and I wonder why
> aren't get_publication_oid and get_publication_name in lsyscache.c.
>

Right, both these suggestions make sense to me. Similarly, I think
functions get_subscription_name and get_subscription_oid should also
be moved to lsyscache.c.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.