Re: SerializeParamList vs machines with strict alignment

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, hlinnaka <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
Subject: Re: SerializeParamList vs machines with strict alignment
Date: 2018-10-04 02:30:41
Message-ID: CAA4eK1L=VNpMiG9PrJy3QfwCz=Kvz9FvzgG48v2cQdmPFrUR4A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 10:02 AM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > Now chipmunk also failed for the same test.
> >
> > > What I find more interesting is
> > > that both of the live Sparc critters are happy --- so despite
> > > Thomas' statements upthread, they're coping with unaligned accesses.
> > > Maybe you should have back-patched the test to older branches so
> > > we could see what castoroides and protosciurus would do. But it's
> > > probably not worth additional delay.
> > >
> >
> > Agreed, I will push the code-fix on HEAD and code+test in back-branches.
> >
>
> Pushed, let's wait and see if this can make all the failing buidfarm
> members (due to this issue) happy.
>

All the affected members (gharial, chipmunk, anole) are happy. It
feels good to see chipmunk becoming green after so many days. Thanks
a lot, Tom for your assistance.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2018-10-04 03:19:56 Re: [HACKERS] Secondary index access optimizations
Previous Message Bossart, Nathan 2018-10-04 01:32:47 Re: Add SKIP LOCKED to VACUUM and ANALYZE