| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: CountDBSubscriptions check in dropdb |
| Date: | 2019-11-09 12:07:27 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1L+1irgi+8QtFbj4jpiZ69KVEvK+spDn5cP-rubB_MM0g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Nov 9, 2019 at 3:58 PM Peter Eisentraut
<peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On 2019-11-08 14:38, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > I am planning to commit and backpatch this till PG10 where it was
> > introduced on Monday morning (IST). Pavel agreed that this is a good
> > change in the other thread where we need it [1]. It is not an urgent
> > thing, so I can wait if we think this is not a good time to commit
> > this. Let me know if anyone has objections?
>
> I think the change makes sense for master, but I don't think it should
> be backpatched.
>
Fair enough. Attached patch with a proposed commit message.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| rearrange_countdbsubscription_check_2.patch | application/octet-stream | 2.3 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Eugen Konkov | 2019-11-09 12:10:13 | Re: Does 'instead of delete' trigger support modification of OLD |
| Previous Message | Eugen Konkov | 2019-11-09 12:05:02 | Re: Does 'instead of delete' trigger support modification of OLD |