Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422(at)gmail(dot)com>, "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Alexey Lesovsky <lesovsky(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side
Date: 2021-11-25 04:57:09
Message-ID: CAA4eK1KzZp5YC34exW3Yb4Vk9v5iMW0YuJCQsWeTOeF7ejLdXw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 5:14 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Changed. I've removed first_error_time as per discussion on the thread
> for adding xact stats.
>

We also agreed to change the column names to start with last_error_*
[1]. Is there a reason to not make those changes? Do you think that we
can change it just before committing that patch? I thought it might be
better to do it that way now itself.

[1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAD21AoCQ8z5goy3BCqfk2gn5p8NVH5B-uxO3Xc-dXN-MXVfnKg%40mail.gmail.com

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bharath Rupireddy 2021-11-25 05:14:03 pg_dump, pg_basebackup don't error out with wrong option for "--format"
Previous Message Bharath Rupireddy 2021-11-25 04:52:15 Re: pg_replslotdata - a tool for displaying replication slot information