Re: Proposal : Parallel Merge Join

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposal : Parallel Merge Join
Date: 2017-02-25 12:37:48
Message-ID: CAA4eK1Kv_T6G1RA_8bwAgGKw-SC7LGRNwCuThtek4TczCuisBw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 3:22 PM, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 11:29 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> It seems you have forgotten to change in the below check:
>>
>> + if (innerpath != NULL &&
>> + innerpath->parallel_safe &&
>> + (cheapest_startup_inner == NULL ||
>> + cheapest_startup_inner->parallel_safe == false ||
>> + compare_path_costs(innerpath, cheapest_startup_inner,
>> + STARTUP_COST) < 0))
>
> Oops, Fixed.
>

Thanks, patch looks good to me (apart from some of the code comments
which might need some adjustment and I think it is better if Committer
takes care of same as required rather than we argue about it) and I
have changed the status as Ready For Committer.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-02-25 13:24:13 Re: logical replication access control patches
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2017-02-25 11:42:25 Re: Enabling parallelism for queries coming from SQL or other PL functions