Re: Reviewing freeze map code

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Reviewing freeze map code
Date: 2016-06-09 03:18:24
Message-ID: CAA4eK1KsYLoZ=vmqk7ocgTPF9BCiaWDKGsXtROXFN=xie2Up1w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 6:31 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> Here's my proposal:
>
> 1. You already implemented a function to find non-frozen tuples on
> supposedly all-frozen pages. Great.
>
> 2. Let's implement a second function to find dead tuples on supposedly
> all-visible pages.
>

I am planning to name them as pg_check_frozen and pg_check_visible, let me
know if you something else suits better?

With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oleg Bartunov 2016-06-09 08:22:10 Re: Should phraseto_tsquery('simple', 'blue blue') @@ to_tsvector('simple', 'blue') be true ?
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-06-09 03:17:18 Re: [sqlsmith] Failed assertion in parallel worker (ExecInitSubPlan)