Re: row filtering for logical replication

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Önder Kalacı <onderkalaci(at)gmail(dot)com>, japin <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: row filtering for logical replication
Date: 2021-09-28 04:09:30
Message-ID: CAA4eK1KrX90Bek=y9Fd=DnhOe2goWHX6+QKgjwnTvdb0kB6QCg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 7:19 PM Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2021, at 10:34 AM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I see no one responded to this important part of my review so far:
>
> I'm still preparing a new patch and a summary.
>
> Am I the only one finding the current behavior strange? What's the
> reasoning supporting the current approach?
>
> I think it is an oversight from my side. It used to work the way you mentioned
> but I changed it. I'll include this change in the next patch.
>

+1.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Drouvot, Bertrand 2021-09-28 04:24:42 Re: [BUG] failed assertion in EnsurePortalSnapshotExists()
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2021-09-28 04:01:33 Re: Column Filtering in Logical Replication