Re: Design of pg_stat_subscription_workers vs pgstats

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, "osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Design of pg_stat_subscription_workers vs pgstats
Date: 2022-03-02 02:05:46
Message-ID: CAA4eK1KnXoeypmFn02Ht60mD92kAO00gA=jKXkY7sjASo9r21Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 1:15 PM tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com
<tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 12:32 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > I decided to keep this part of the docs as it is and fixed a few other
> > minor comments raised by you and Peter. Additionally, I have bumped
> > the PGSTAT_FILE_FORMAT_ID. I'll push this patch tomorrow unless there
> > are any other major comments.
> >
>
> Thanks for your patch. I have finished the review/test for this patch.
> The patch LGTM.
>

Pushed.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message wangw.fnst@fujitsu.com 2022-03-02 02:06:17 RE: Logical replication timeout problem
Previous Message Tom Lane 2022-03-02 02:05:02 Re: Condition pushdown: why (=) is pushed down into join, but BETWEEN or >= is not?