Re: Logical replication 'invalid memory alloc request size 1585837200' after upgrading to 17.5

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Duncan Sands <duncan(dot)sands(at)deepbluecap(dot)com>, Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Logical replication 'invalid memory alloc request size 1585837200' after upgrading to 17.5
Date: 2025-06-24 03:51:06
Message-ID: CAA4eK1KiKGRVgpfvmYv3r77mRmW_DGhtvMWibYTeNEwu6dngEQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 6:54 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 11:05 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 9:03 PM Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)
> > <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Dear Sawada-san,
> > >
> > > > One solution is to have two expected-output files to cover both cases.
> > > > We do a similar thing for the plpgsql_cache.sql test case. What do you
> > > > think?
> > >
> > > Personally I don't like the approach because XXX_1.out can be easily missed to be
> > > updated, but it is not a strong opinion.
> >
> > I think that we have only a few releases for v13 and there would not
> > likely be many cases where we need to update _1.out file. But I'm open
> > to other ideas. Do you prefer removing the test from v13? I'm not sure
> > that just because it's easy to miss updating a _1.out file is a good
> > reason to remove tests.
> >
>
> I've added the patch for that idea for discussion. I considered moving
> the new cache-behavior-dependent test to another test file to minimize
> the maintenance effort but didn't do that at this stage as the test
> file has only a few tests.
>

Your proposal sounds good to me.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2025-06-24 04:18:45 Re: Logical replication 'invalid memory alloc request size 1585837200' after upgrading to 17.5
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2025-06-24 01:24:03 Re: Logical replication 'invalid memory alloc request size 1585837200' after upgrading to 17.5