Re: Logical replication can lose an update after concurrent index invalidation

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Mihail Nikalayeu <mihailnikalayeu(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, onderkalaci(at)gmail(dot)com
Subject: Re: Logical replication can lose an update after concurrent index invalidation
Date: 2026-09-22 10:03:01
Message-ID: CAA4eK1Kg0rOWpivPvV=gumAAmXMA4hB5bEforD41H19rqhyGfw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Sep 21, 2026 at 6:01 PM vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Here is an updated version including the back-branches version.
> This version also addresses Hou-san's agreed 1st comment from [1].
>

We should include the test till the version where required Injection
Point functionality is present.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bertrand Drouvot 2026-09-22 10:03:10 Re: Add a permission check to pg_stat_get_backend_subxact()
Previous Message Matthias van de Meent 2026-09-22 09:55:14 Re: [PATCH] set_byte() with a count argument