| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Shlok Kyal <shlok(dot)kyal(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Nisha Moond <nisha(dot)moond412(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Logical Replication of sequences |
| Date: | 2025-10-09 08:16:28 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1KagshVLj0pAee3WNT6WcUUt2kd=imfSPA1MwwZAY-diw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Oct 9, 2025 at 12:30 PM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Something about all these ideas seems strange to me:
>
> I think the "ALTER SUBSCRIPTION sub REFRESH PUBLICATION" command has
> the word PUBLICATION in it because it's the PUBLICATION has changed
> (stuff added/removed), so we need to refresh it.
>
> OTOH, the synchronisation of *existing* sequences is different - this
> is more like the subscription saying "Just get me updated values for
> the sequences I already know about". Therefore, I don't think the word
> PUBLICATION is relevant here.
>
makes sense.
> ~~
>
> So my suggestion is very different. Just this:
> "ALTER SUBSCRIPTION sub REFRESH SEQUENCES"
>
+1.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chao Li | 2025-10-09 08:39:43 | Re: Optimize LISTEN/NOTIFY |
| Previous Message | John Naylor | 2025-10-09 08:15:11 | Re: get rid of RM_HEAP2_ID |