| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: logical decoding and replication of sequences, take 2 |
| Date: | 2023-07-11 07:41:40 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1KaO_3gqddWZkg2yJy2AjcWbSG1G_65ev6swx3q2Pu1Dg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 11:30 AM Ashutosh Bapat
<ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> I have not looked at the DDL replication patch in detail so I may be
> missing something. IIUC, that patch replicates the DDL statement in
> some form: parse tree or statement. But it doesn't replicate the some
> or all WAL records that the DDL execution generates.
>
Yes, the DDL replication patch uses the parse tree and catalog
information to generate a deparsed form of DDL statement which is WAL
logged and used to replicate DDLs.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2023-07-11 07:45:26 | Re: Support to define custom wait events for extensions |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2023-07-11 07:37:00 | Re: doc: clarify the limitation for logical replication when REPILICA IDENTITY is FULL |