| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Assertion failure in GetSubscriptionRelations() with concurrent DROP TABLE |
| Date: | 2026-08-26 10:21:05 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1KYrhbyruVrijDA-4QhXuYwoGkifzwdm2JyD9_yTG+7dQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Aug 26, 2026 at 3:55 AM Bharath Rupireddy
<bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2026 at 12:53 PM Nathan Bossart
> <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > Does this one deserve a mention on the open items wiki [0]?
> >
> > [0] https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_19_Open_Items
>
> I don't think so TBH. Given that it's not easily reproducible with
> direct SQL and we seem to have agreement on the fix. However, I will
> wait for Amit/Vignesh or others here.
>
I have pushed the fix. The reason to not add it to open items was that
the fix was simple and we have an agreement. Thanks for the review.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | shveta malik | 2026-08-26 10:45:14 | Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication |
| Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2026-08-26 10:14:59 | Re: doc: Reformat SELECT queries using GRAPH_TABLE |