Re: running logical replication as the subscription owner

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Subject: Re: running logical replication as the subscription owner
Date: 2023-04-03 11:54:29
Message-ID: CAA4eK1KWGW5HP7osN10dK-OJ_Q-00N9ZvvqkXZAuN69VT6+T2g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 7:12 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> I don't think run_as_owner is terrible, despite the ambiguity. It's
> talking about the owner of the object on which the property is being
> set.
>

I find this justification quite reasonable to keep the option name as
run_as_owner. So, +1 to use the new option name as run_as_owner.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2023-04-03 11:56:57 Re: Option to not use ringbuffer in VACUUM, using it in failsafe mode
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2023-04-03 11:44:03 Re: Why enable_hashjoin Completely disables HashJoin