Re: UPDATE of partition key

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: UPDATE of partition key
Date: 2017-05-17 09:45:07
Message-ID: CAA4eK1KUcuQdxfQj=rmSHzVMP6WFg6sjVPtDJrha=ySLWVKZAw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 12:06 PM, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 4:17 PM, Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Option 3
>> --------
>>
>> BR, AR delete triggers on source partition
>> BR, AR insert triggers on destination partition.
>>
>> Rationale :
>> Since the update is converted to delete+insert, just skip the update
>> triggers completely.
>
> +1 to option3
>
..
> Earlier I thought that option1 is better but later I think that this
> can complicate the situation as we are firing first BR update then BR
> delete and can change the row multiple time and defining such
> behaviour can be complicated.
>

If we have to go by this theory, then the option you have preferred
will still execute BR triggers for both delete and insert, so input
row can still be changed twice.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2017-05-17 10:29:16 Re: UPDATE of partition key
Previous Message Jeevan Ladhe 2017-05-17 09:38:26 fix hard-coded index in make_partition_op_expr