From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Mithun Cy <mithun(dot)cy(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Hash Indexes |
Date: | 2016-12-02 06:54:54 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1KU3-4SCaDP0=N=24etVVU2Jgw+0=pcc-pxRGqADJgs7Q@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 8:56 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 12:43 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 2:18 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 8:50 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>> [ new patch ]
>>>
>>> Committed with some further cosmetic changes.
>>
>> Thank you very much.
>>
>>> I think it would be worth testing this code with very long overflow
>>> chains by hacking the fill factor up to 1000
>>
>> 1000 is not a valid value for fill factor. Do you intend to say 100?
>
> No. IIUC, 100 would mean split when the average bucket contains 1
> page worth of tuples.
>
I also think so.
> I want to split when the average bucket
> contains 10 pages worth of tuples.
>
oh, I think what you mean to say is hack the code to bump fill factor
and then test it. I was confused that how can user can do that from
SQL command.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Haribabu Kommi | 2016-12-02 07:00:39 | Re: pgbench more operators & functions |
Previous Message | Haribabu Kommi | 2016-12-02 06:50:02 | Re: PATCH: two slab-like memory allocators |