Re: Hash Indexes

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Mithun Cy <mithun(dot)cy(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Hash Indexes
Date: 2016-12-02 06:54:54
Message-ID: CAA4eK1KU3-4SCaDP0=N=24etVVU2Jgw+0=pcc-pxRGqADJgs7Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 8:56 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 12:43 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 2:18 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 8:50 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>> [ new patch ]
>>>
>>> Committed with some further cosmetic changes.
>>
>> Thank you very much.
>>
>>> I think it would be worth testing this code with very long overflow
>>> chains by hacking the fill factor up to 1000
>>
>> 1000 is not a valid value for fill factor. Do you intend to say 100?
>
> No. IIUC, 100 would mean split when the average bucket contains 1
> page worth of tuples.
>

I also think so.

> I want to split when the average bucket
> contains 10 pages worth of tuples.
>

oh, I think what you mean to say is hack the code to bump fill factor
and then test it. I was confused that how can user can do that from
SQL command.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Haribabu Kommi 2016-12-02 07:00:39 Re: pgbench more operators & functions
Previous Message Haribabu Kommi 2016-12-02 06:50:02 Re: PATCH: two slab-like memory allocators