| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, Zsolt Parragi <zsolt(dot)parragi(at)percona(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, shveta malik <shvetamalik(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_dump --exclude-table loses FOR ALL TABLES EXCEPT publications |
| Date: | 2026-11-06 06:09:45 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1KPrrL4OtsqMERefAdNihBmCtTfNa0FmEoipUq1Xp2WZw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Nov 6, 2026 at 9:08 AM shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 6, 2026 at 4:35 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > IMO, the "fix" (if deemed necessary) for this is just to add similar
> > notes for "-T", "-N", and "--filter". Or some generic note about them
> > in the "Notes" section at the bottom.
> >
>
> I think we are good with the current notes, but let's see what others
> have to say on this.
>
+1. I also think the current behavior is expected. I see an argument
of adding this behaviour in pg-dump docs but it is not clear to me if
doing so really adds value. OTOH, if others think that will be
helpful, I won't mind adding it.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Xuneng Zhou | 2026-11-06 06:33:52 | Re: [Bug Report + Patch] File descriptor leak when io_method=io_uring |
| Previous Message | Dilip Kumar | 2026-11-06 06:03:54 | Re: Incorrect CONTEXT reported for errors from parallel apply worker in logical replication |