Re: [HACKERS] Pluggable storage

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Pluggable storage
Date: 2018-06-14 02:25:56
Message-ID: CAA4eK1KOxHsyijHqp5z7TQDviP_rsrWBbxBvAMvuvY9k+-ZK=w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 1:50 AM, Haribabu Kommi
<kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 4:44 PM Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
> VACUUM:
> Not much changes are done in this apart moving the Vacuum visibility
> functions as part of the
> storage. But idea for the Vacuum was with each access method can define how
> it should perform.
>

We are planning to have a somewhat different mechanism for vacuum (for
non-delete marked indexes), so if you can provide some details or
discuss what you have in mind before implementation of same, that
would be great.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2018-06-14 02:37:40 Shared access methods?
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2018-06-14 02:22:48 Re: [Proposal] Table-level Transparent Data Encryption (TDE) and Key Management Service (KMS)