Re: Adding a LogicalRepWorker type field

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Adding a LogicalRepWorker type field
Date: 2023-08-18 03:20:26
Message-ID: CAA4eK1KF=kt0_Jrr2nyCa9-BF1sycFyZfE0TYF4jcTF=HF6YWw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 12:08 PM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> The main patch for adding the worker type enum has been pushed [1].
>
> Here is the remaining (rebased) patch for changing some previous
> cascading if/else to switch on the LogicalRepWorkerType enum instead.
>

I see this as being useful if we plan to add more worker types. Does
anyone else see this remaining patch as an improvement?

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiro Ikeda 2023-08-18 03:27:02 Rethink the wait event names for postgres_fdw, dblink and etc
Previous Message Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) 2023-08-18 03:12:19 RE: [PoC] pg_upgrade: allow to upgrade publisher node