Re: Patch for reorderbuffer.c documentation.

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Patch for reorderbuffer.c documentation.
Date: 2020-07-18 09:15:28
Message-ID: CAA4eK1K9cZW3_+L-8SZqK931xpfK4paoti=wz0pTwKzt30+sXA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 8:59 PM Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 17 Jul 2020 at 11:17, David G. Johnston <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 8:10 AM Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>
>>> This started out with just fixing
>>>
>>> "One option do deal" to " One option to deal"
>>>
>>> But after reading the rest I'd propose the following patch.
>>
>>
>> Suggest replacing "though" with "however" instead of trying to figure out what amount of commas is readable (the original seemed better IMO).
>>
>> "However, the transaction records are fairly small and"
>
>
> Works for me.
>

Thanks, pushed.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2020-07-18 09:46:01 Re: pg_ctl behavior on Windows
Previous Message Dean Rasheed 2020-07-18 08:16:39 Re: Wrong results from in_range() tests with infinite offset