| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Avoid streaming the transaction which are skipped (in corner cases) |
| Date: | 2022-12-08 04:53:40 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1K8xAKxUgGKafQT+dXVRKFFzBQtoteeqBY0BftTUUFYxA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 9:35 AM shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com
<shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 7, 2022 12:01 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Thanks. I think it is better to go ahead with this patch and once we
> > > decide what is the right thing to do in terms of GUC then we can try
> > > to add additional tests for this. Anyway, it is not that the code
> > > added by this patch is not getting covered by existing tests. What do
> > > you think?
> >
> > That makes sense to me.
> >
>
> +1
>
Pushed.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Vik Fearing | 2022-12-08 05:00:54 | Re: ANY_VALUE aggregate |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2022-12-08 04:51:54 | Re: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply |