Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Neha Sharma <neha(dot)sharma(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions
Date: 2020-09-01 04:01:38
Message-ID: CAA4eK1K7HvhJ4w5B4PorY_mwJyBDFi_K050LjNCGAipkJQQrNw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 10:27 PM Neha Sharma
<neha(dot)sharma(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi Amit/Dilip,
>
> I have tested a few scenarios on top of the v56 patches, where the replication worker still had few subtransactions in uncommitted state and we restart the publisher server.
> No crash or data discrepancies were observed, attached are the test scenarios verified.
>

Thanks, I have pushed the fix
(https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=4ab77697f67aa5b90b032b9175b46901859da6d7).

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2020-09-01 04:41:04 Re: Include access method in listTables output
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2020-09-01 03:58:34 Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions