Re: parallel vacuum comments

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Subject: Re: parallel vacuum comments
Date: 2021-12-10 12:08:43
Message-ID: CAA4eK1K5E0Hsd-iBE2oO8WAGL6p+iagqWRPP=-9E1EHyrNtpCw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 6:05 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 7:44 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Agreed with the above two points.
>
> I've attached updated patches that incorporated the above comments
> too. Please review them.
>

I have made the following minor changes to the 0001 patch: (a) An
assert was removed from dead_items_max_items() which I added back. (b)
Removed an unnecessary semicolon from one of the statements in
compute_parallel_vacuum_workers(). (c) Changed comments at a few
places. (d) moved all parallel_vacuum_* related functions together.
(e) ran pgindent and slightly modify the commit message.

Let me know what you think of the attached?

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

Attachment Content-Type Size
v8-0001-Improve-parallel-vacuum-implementation.patch application/octet-stream 52.6 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2021-12-10 13:08:52 Re: Column Filtering in Logical Replication
Previous Message Jakub Wartak 2021-12-10 11:06:37 RE: track_io_timing default setting