Re: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "wangw(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <wangw(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, "shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply
Date: 2023-04-24 05:24:11
Message-ID: CAA4eK1K4zjeCmZUX_L09-VhjMxfqcCa+OMmpHre7YWTY2Tgxsw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 7:26 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> While looking at the worker.c, I realized that we have the following
> code in handle_streamed_transaction():
>
> default:
> Assert(false);
> return false; / silence compiler warning /
>
> I think it's better to do elog(ERROR) instead of Assert() as it ends
> up returning false in non-assertion builds, which might cause a
> problem. And it's more consistent with other codes in worker.c. Please
> find an attached patch.
>

I haven't tested it but otherwise, the changes look good to me.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiko Sawada 2023-04-24 05:45:04 Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2023-04-24 05:22:15 Re: pg_stat_io not tracking smgrwriteback() is confusing