Re: pg_upgrade and logical replication

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade and logical replication
Date: 2023-11-13 11:31:55
Message-ID: CAA4eK1K4uX=g5tgkqhZsmmUKk9NtsM6YTQwA9NFrH-Wr76w1uA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 7:26 PM vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the comments, the attached v13 version patch has the
> changes for the same.
>

+
+ ReplicationOriginNameForLogicalRep(subid, InvalidOid, originname,
sizeof(originname));
+ originid = replorigin_by_name(originname, false);
+ replorigin_advance(originid, sublsn, InvalidXLogRecPtr,
+ false /* backward */ ,
+ false /* WAL log */ );

This seems to update the origin state only in memory. Is it sufficient
to use this here? Anyway, I think using this requires us to first
acquire RowExclusiveLock on pg_replication_origin something the patch
is doing for some other system table.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bharath Rupireddy 2023-11-13 12:13:13 Re: add log messages when replication slots become active and inactive (was Re: Is it worth adding ReplicationSlot active_pid to ReplicationSlotPersistentData?)
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2023-11-13 11:31:42 Re: pgsql: doc: fix wording describing the checkpoint_flush_after GUC