From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_upgrade and logical replication |
Date: | 2023-11-13 11:31:55 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1K4uX=g5tgkqhZsmmUKk9NtsM6YTQwA9NFrH-Wr76w1uA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 7:26 PM vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the comments, the attached v13 version patch has the
> changes for the same.
>
+
+ ReplicationOriginNameForLogicalRep(subid, InvalidOid, originname,
sizeof(originname));
+ originid = replorigin_by_name(originname, false);
+ replorigin_advance(originid, sublsn, InvalidXLogRecPtr,
+ false /* backward */ ,
+ false /* WAL log */ );
This seems to update the origin state only in memory. Is it sufficient
to use this here? Anyway, I think using this requires us to first
acquire RowExclusiveLock on pg_replication_origin something the patch
is doing for some other system table.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bharath Rupireddy | 2023-11-13 12:13:13 | Re: add log messages when replication slots become active and inactive (was Re: Is it worth adding ReplicationSlot active_pid to ReplicationSlotPersistentData?) |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2023-11-13 11:31:42 | Re: pgsql: doc: fix wording describing the checkpoint_flush_after GUC |