Re: WIP: WAL prefetch (another approach)

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Jakub Wartak <Jakub(dot)Wartak(at)tomtom(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIP: WAL prefetch (another approach)
Date: 2021-04-16 12:05:42
Message-ID: CAA4eK1K2z=YVh0QCY7JTOXdiutOCMfRjDJMYTqLudXDzK2CYZQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 2:16 AM Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>

In commit 1d257577e08d3e598011d6850fd1025858de8c8c, there is a change
in file format for stats, won't it require bumping
PGSTAT_FILE_FORMAT_ID?

Actually, I came across this while working on my today's commit
f5fc2f5b23 where I forgot to bump PGSTAT_FILE_FORMAT_ID. So, I thought
maybe we can bump it just once if required?

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais 2021-04-16 13:09:36 Re: Retry in pgbench
Previous Message Matthias van de Meent 2021-04-16 12:02:56 Re: ATTACH PARTITION locking documentation for DEFAULT partitions