Re: PG 10 release notes

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PG 10 release notes
Date: 2017-04-27 02:30:28
Message-ID: CAA4eK1K2XNJKCgO0AYk=u6XXyRKmiLkig9Av0L_KqoyiVn8J0A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 8:46 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 07:38:05PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
>> >> I have already mentioned the commit id (5e6d8d2b). Text can be "Allow
>> >> queries containing subplans to execute in parallel". We should also
>> >> mention in some way that this applies only when the query contains
>> >> uncorrelated subplan.
>> >
>> > Sorry but I don't know what that means, and if I don't know, others
>> > might not either.
>> >
>>
>> regression=# explain (costs off) select count(*) from tenk1 where
>> (two, four) not in (select hundred, thousand from tenk2 where
>> thousand > 100);
>> QUERY PLAN
>> ------------------------------------------------------
>> Finalize Aggregate
>> -> Gather
>> Workers Planned: 2
>> -> Partial Aggregate
>> -> Parallel Seq Scan on tenk1
>> Filter: (NOT (hashed SubPlan 1))
>> SubPlan 1
>> -> Seq Scan on tenk2
>> Filter: (thousand > 100)
>> (9 rows)
>>
>
> Oh, so non-correlated subqueries can be run in parallel. Yes, that is
> something we should have in the release notes. How is this?
>
> Author: Robert Haas <rhaas(at)postgresql(dot)org>
> 2017-02-14 [5e6d8d2bb] Allow parallel workers to execute subplans.
>
> Allow non-correlated subqueries to be run in parallel (Amit Kapila)
>

Looks good to me.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-04-27 02:32:03 Re: vcregress support for single TAP tests
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2017-04-27 02:10:34 Re: StandbyRecoverPreparedTransactions recovers subtrans links incorrectly