Re: Parallel Index Scans

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Anastasia Lubennikova <lubennikovaav(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed(dot)90(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Parallel Index Scans
Date: 2017-01-19 09:28:14
Message-ID: CAA4eK1K1xPtM6O+Q-+Us3+dKRvPW+8BW+5=9gwUtgysp3fKfpA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 12:28 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 7:11 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Fixed.
>
> With respect to the second patch
> (parallel_index_opt_exec_support_v4.patch), I'm hoping it can use the
> new function from Dilip's bitmap heap scan patch set. See commit
> 716c7d4b242f0a64ad8ac4dc48c6fed6557ba12c.
>

Updated patch has used the function from above commit.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Anastasia Lubennikova 2017-01-19 09:33:57 Re: Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2017-01-19 09:27:19 Re: Parallel Index Scans