From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
Subject: | Re: Fix checkpoint skip logic on idle systems by tracking LSN progress |
Date: | 2016-12-22 10:20:05 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1K1Abk0zL=a9QJEvo-qTNtgVZM++cpBqS7m1gFX-+3BBg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 3:10 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> On 2016-12-21 16:35:28 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 4:28 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>> > - Similarly I don't like the name "progress LSN" much. What does
>> > "progress" really mean in that". Maybe "consistency LSN"?
>>
>> Whoa. -1 from me for "consistency LSN". Consistency has to with
>> whether the cluster has recovered up to the minimum recovery point or
>> whatever -- that is -- questions like "am i going to run into torn
>> pages?" and "should I expect some heap tuples to maybe be missing
>> index tuples, or the other way around?".
>
> That's imo pretty much what progress LSN currently describes. Have there
> been any records which are important for durability/consistency and
> hence need to be archived and such.
>
>
>> What I think "progress LSN"
>> is getting at -- actually fairly well -- is whether we're getting
>> anything *important* done, not whether we are consistent. I don't
>> mind changing the name, but not to consistency LSN.
>
> Well, progress could just as well be replay. Or the actual insertion
> point. Or up to where we've written out. Or synced out. Or
> replicated....
>
> Open to other suggestions - I'm not really happy with consistency LSN,
> but definitely unhappy with progress LSN.
>
last_essential_LSN?
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | amul sul | 2016-12-22 10:20:43 | Re: pg_background contrib module proposal |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2016-12-22 09:56:40 | Re: Proposal for CSN based snapshots |