From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: POC: Cleaning up orphaned files using undo logs |
Date: | 2019-06-20 10:48:09 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1K-aOR8KQQPj+7-M+CogSWWbLQpinb75Ajg7kf1H_+XLA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 11:35 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 2:07 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 7:31 AM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > > [ new patches ]
> >
> > I tried writing some code [ to use these patches ].
>
>
> for (;;)
> {
> UnpackedUndoRecord *uur = UndoFetchRecord(urp);
> if (i like this one)
> break;
> urp = uur->uur_blkprev; // should be renamed, since zedstore +
> probably others will have tuple chains not block chains
..
+1 for renaming this variable. How about uur_prev_ver or uur_prevver
or uur_verprev? Any other suggestions?
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2019-06-20 12:34:17 | Re: [Proposal] Table-level Transparent Data Encryption (TDE) and Key Management Service (KMS) |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2019-06-20 10:43:56 | Re: POC: Cleaning up orphaned files using undo logs |