Re: Merging postgresql.conf and postgresql.auto.conf

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: David Johnston <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Merging postgresql.conf and postgresql.auto.conf
Date: 2015-01-20 03:41:42
Message-ID: CAA4eK1JzFM7qt_02RiN=FQPcgLoJWPHu-kF2yBkz8QPgXTJ+zw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
>
>
> Right, but we can't completely eliminate such a possibility (as an
> example we have some default settings like max_connections,
> shared_buffers, etc). I agree with you that users should use only
> way

Sorry for incomplete sentence, I mean to say "only one way"

> of changing the settings, however for certain rare cases (default
> settings or some other) we can provide a way for user to know which
> of the settings are duplicate. I think if we can provide such an
> information via some view with ease then it's worth to have it.
>

With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2015-01-20 03:47:02 Re: B-Tree support function number 3 (strxfrm() optimization)
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2015-01-20 03:39:09 Re: Merging postgresql.conf and postgresql.auto.conf