Re: Misleading comment in prologue of ReorderBufferQueueMessage

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Misleading comment in prologue of ReorderBufferQueueMessage
Date: 2020-12-19 06:42:16
Message-ID: CAA4eK1JwwvM9+OO9gZB-pfm-=jSdkgNsS-gvz5ZgJO1j_hh80A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 3:37 PM Ashutosh Bapat
<ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 8:00 AM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> How about something like below:
>> A transactional message is queued to be processed upon commit and a
>> non-transactional message gets processed immediately.
>
>
> Used this one. PFA patch.
>

Pushed!

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2020-12-19 06:57:35 Re: proposal: schema variables
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2020-12-19 06:40:30 Re: Single transaction in the tablesync worker?